Quantcast
My site was nominated for Best Health Blog!

Posts Tagged ‘Medicaid’

October 24th, 2009

North Dakota Doctors Express Concern Over Public Option

Irving

Dr. Kimberly Krohn  is a family practitioner in Minot, ND.  Dr. Robert Thompson is an allergist & immunologist in Grand Forks, ND. Dr. Michael Booth is a thoracic surgeon in Bismarck, ND.

Dr. Krohn, Dr. Thompson and Dr. Booth are members in the North Dakota Medical Association and they have voiced their strong feelings on a public option and the disastorous effects it would have to medical care in rural North Dakota.

The NDMA put out the following statement:

Very few states have a higher combination of high quality and cost-effective medical care than North Dakota. Yet, while North Dakotans contribute equally to Medicare, they have some of the lowest Medicare reimbursement rates in the country simply because we are a rural state.

For example, an average office visit in a North Dakota clinic in 2010 will result in a much lower Medicare reimbursement ($47.84) than a physician treating a similar patient in San Francisco ($66) — 31 percent less. A Medicare payment for a mammogram screening in North Dakota will be reimbursed at $49.92, while that same screening in San Francisco is reimbursed at $73.82 — more than 32 percent less for North Dakota. These are just two examples of how federal “geographic adjusters” impact North Dakota.

North Dakota does not receive Medicare reimbursement that fully covers the costs involved with diagnosing and treating patients. In addition, if people currently insured by Blue Cross Blue Shield North Dakota shift to a public option at Medicare rates, our largest hospitals will experience a decrease in funding by millions of dollars that would not be offset by new payments for people previously uninsured.

Resources are needed from all our payor sources — both government and private insurers — to ensure that we in North Dakota can recruit and keep good doctors and nurses and make sure we have the medical technology, available facility space and support needed to provide safe and efficient care for patients. We need to ensure that good medical care is available when and where it’s needed, and ensure that patients can choose their physician and health plan.

A public option tied to Medicare reimbursement will only make an already unfair situation worse for North Dakota, and would dismantle some of our nation’s most successful but vulnerable delivery systems which have produced higher-value, more cost-effective care. The promise of universal coverage could be dashed by just such a reduction in access.

NDMA is also advocating for reforms that provide the greatest possible access to medical care for patients at an affordable cost and provide incentives for better “value” that can actually reduce costs. Some examples are to encourage better preventive care and keep patients with chronic diseases healthier and out of the hospital. Promoting higher quality and more cost-effective care will reduce health care costs, as will good wellness and prevention initiatives.

We need support to implement patient-centered medical homes to improve care coordination, including increased funding for primary care services that does not come at the expense of good access to specialty care. We need to expand our healthcare workforce, including more support for medical education and residency programs.

We need health insurance reforms that eliminate barriers to competition, eliminate exclusions for pre-existing conditions, and assist people who cannot afford private insurance to purchase coverage.

We need meaningful medical liability reform that reduces the waste of resources cause by the “defensive” practice of medicine.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, we need each and every citizen of North Dakota to do what you can to live a healthy lifestyle. Let’s reduce tobacco use through cessation and prevention and encourage each other in ways that decrease the incidence of obesity through good diet and exercise choices.

The current debate offers a major opportunity for North Dakota to address the unfair reduction in health care resources by the federal government, and to embrace what is best for North Dakota patients.
 

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [Mixx] [MySpace] [Sphere] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]
VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

2 Comments » Post a Comment »

September 1st, 2009

Circumcision Helps Prevent the Spread of HIV, HPV and Other STDs

diane
circumcision procedure (nzherald.co.nz)

circumcision procedure (nzherald.co.nz)

In the late 19th Century, Victorian era doctors described the male foreskin as “a source of mischief”, according to the Sunday New York Times. Now in the 21st century studies are showing that cells in the foreskin act as a magnet for HIV, Herpes and other STD’s. Health officials are now considering whether they should offer circumcision as a voluntary option for infants and even adult men who are at risk for HIV.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has estimated that at least 45 million people in the United States aged 12 and older have had herpes or HSV-2 and about 20 million are currently infected with human papillomavirus, HPV. Research has indicated that male circumcision reduces the risk of sexually transmitted disease and even certain types of cancer. It is already known that it can decrease the risk of penile cancer, a relatively rare disease.

In a study of more than 5,000 uncircumcised adult Ugandan males, researchers found that after circumcision the rates of infection with the virus that causes herpes went down by 28 percent and the transmission of HPV was reduced by 35 percent. In another study circumcision reduced infection with the HIV virus by 60 percent.  The procedure did not protect against syphilis and safe sex practices, such as condoms, are still necessary to provide the best protection.

Asked about the applicability of the African results to men in the United States, Dr. Ronald H. Gray, a professor of reproductive epidemiology at John Hopkins and co- principal investigator, said:

“There is no reason to believe that this is in any way unique to Africa.”

Dr. Thomas Quinn

Dr. Thomas Quinn

Dr. Thomas Quinn, senior investigator in infectious diseases at the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious diseases explained why removing the foreskin helps reduce the transmission of certain infections.

“The foreskin has two different sides. The outside is much like regular skin cells. However the inside is mucosal, similar to a woman’s vagina… It’s likely that there are vital receptors on that mucosal side that makes it easier for a virus to get into the cells.”

According to Vitals.com, Dr. Quinn received his medical degree at Northwestern University and completed his residency in internal medicine at Albany Medical Center.

Circumcision may be especially important for minority US populations, including Hispanic and African American males, since they are most at risk from HIV infections to date. Unfortunately Medicaid, which insures many low income patients, doesn’t pay for even routine infant circumcision in 16 states. Hopefully the growing evidence will persuade lawmakers in the United States and other countries to officially recommend the procedure. This would make patient education and insurance coverage more likely.

“The findings suggest that there are important lifetime health benefits to the procedure. I think it’s important that pediatricians consider the lifelong benefits that might accrue from circumcision when they are advising parents on whether the procedure should be performed on baby boys,” says Dr. Gray.

Their next focus will be to ascertain whether male circumcision can reduce transmission of HPV to female sexual partners. This would be hugely significant since HPV causes cervical cancer.

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [LinkedIn] [Mixx] [MySpace] [Sphere] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]
VN:F [1.8.4_1055]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)

12 Comments » Post a Comment »


-->